tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390382704873671828.post2863321563031878016..comments2023-11-03T07:23:30.909-05:00Comments on The Monarchist 2.0: Boys will be boys, Harry's a good fellow, the press are to blame, pip pip, tally hoUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390382704873671828.post-2443820448663849592007-06-17T18:47:00.000-05:002007-06-17T18:47:00.000-05:00Ah, yes - The Independent. Isn't that the paper th...Ah, yes - The Independent. Isn't that the paper that has been campaigning for a republic over the past decade? Funny that.<BR/><BR/>What a most disappointing read, Young Husband. I expected far better. I'm afraid you've offered nothing more than tittle-tattle. More "sensationalised and irreverent jaw flapping rubbish" from people who really should know better. Or should they? Let's consider it.<BR/><BR/>In my experience most journalists are rather like prostitutes. They're in it for the money. They need the money. It is a trait they share with most politicians and other social insignificants - like used car salesmen and barristers. You know the sort I mean. The outsiders. The social climbers. The irrelevant. In that respect they can be made to be quite useful. They can be made to serve a purpose. They will do anything for the money.<BR/><BR/>Secretive inner circles are, by definition, secretive. Without the "secret" there can never be "mystery". Without the "mystery" there is no devotion from the masses. Reflect on it and you will understand the motives of some journalists. To harm the Monarchy, they must harm the "mystery". They must interfere with the "secret". They must debase it and make what is not ordinary, seem ordinary. In that way republicans achieve an aim. For who would not say - "I am equal. Perhaps better than them. Why can't I be the King?"<BR/><BR/>Do not assist them in their "work". Do not assist the prostitute. Rather use the prostitute. Again and again.Sir Edward Heathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10015408685370714759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390382704873671828.post-78714410464367203322007-06-17T17:11:00.000-05:002007-06-17T17:11:00.000-05:00Guy Adams in today's Independent writes how "tomor...Guy Adams in today's Independent writes how "tomorrow, William and Harry give a much-anticipated, in-depth interview on American TV. But anyone who wants to know what really makes them tick would be better off studying the shabby style, Sloaney slang and unspoken social rules of their secretive inner circle"<BR/>Read the article at: http://tinyurl.com/34p44aKeirhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17780519140837852601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390382704873671828.post-91165017849380570712007-06-16T05:20:00.000-05:002007-06-16T05:20:00.000-05:00There was me saying we didn't do "sensationalised ...There was me saying we didn't do "sensationalised and irreverent jaw flapping rubbish".<BR/><BR/>Tweedsmuir has given Palmerston his answer.<BR/><BR/>As Prince William recently said: "After ten years there's been a rumbling of people bringing up the bad and over time people seem to forget - or have forgotten - all the amazing things she did and what an amazing person she was. She did everything because she felt it was right and it was what she wanted to do. She didn't go by what she thought the best thing was to do or be told to do something, she would do it from the heart and fully immerse herself into it and she cared, she cared massively. We were left in no doubt that we were the most important thing in her life and then after that there was everyone else, there were all her charities and everything like that and to me that's a really good philosophy - she just loved caring for people and she loved helping. We were so lucky to have her as our mother and there's not a day that goes past when we don't think about her and miss her influence because she was a massive example to both of us."Sir Edward Heathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10015408685370714759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390382704873671828.post-83766883717102061812007-06-15T03:54:00.000-05:002007-06-15T03:54:00.000-05:00She is a hoe! look at the photo!!http://maplejuice...She is a hoe! look at the photo!!<BR/>http://maplejuice.com/2007/06/11/prince-harry-and-barmaid-pictures-hit-tabloids-in-england.aspxAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390382704873671828.post-15282251354976208802007-06-14T17:39:00.000-05:002007-06-14T17:39:00.000-05:00I mentioned here some time ago that William should...I mentioned here some time ago that William should marry an Australian. Alas, we're are doubly unfortunate in that we have the wrong Prince and the wrong colony: Harry is involved with a southern African girl. <BR/><BR/>Although a naturalised Motherlander, I am patriotic about my southern African roots, but South Africa and the Rhodesias aren't where the monarchist fight lies, since our countries are, rightly, African ones with British minorities. Shore up Australia and NZ first, Canada second, and Britain third. <BR/><BR/>So go to it, you Albertan gals - Harry doesn't seem that fussy, and you can do us all a favour!<BR/><BR/>CatoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com