France and UK considered merging, sharing Queen
According to today's Guardian, in an incredible discussion, Britain and France talked about a "union" in the 1950s, even discussing the possibility of the Queen becoming the French head of state.
In one of history's great might-have-beens, on September 10, 1956, Guy Mollet, the French prime minister, came to London to discuss the possibility of a merger between the two countries with Sir Anthony Eden, according to declassified papers from the National Archives, uncovered by the BBC. "When the French prime minister, Monsieur Mollet, was recently in London, he raised with the prime minister the possibility of a union between the United Kingdom and France." This needs to be read in its entirety:
At the time of the proposal, France was in economic difficulties and faced the escalating Suez crisis. Britain had been a staunch French ally during the two world wars. When Mr Mollet's request for a union failed, he quickly responded with another plan - that France be allowed to join the British commonwealth - which was said to have been met more warmly by Sir Anthony.
A document dated September 28, 1956, records a conversation between the prime minister and his cabinet secretary, Sir Norman Brook, saying:
"The PM told him [Brook] on the telephone that he thought, in the light of his talks with the French:
· That we should give immediate consideration to France joining the Commonwealth
· That Monsieur Mollet had not thought there need be difficulty over France accepting the headship of Her Majesty
· That the French would welcome a common citizenship arrangement on the Irish basis."
However, this proposal was also eventually rejected and, a year later, France signed the Treaty of Rome with Germany and the other founding nations of the European common market.
"I tell you the truth - when I read that I am quite astonished," the French Nationalist MP, Jacques Myard, told the BBC today. "I had a good opinion of Mr Mollet before. I think I am going to revise that opinion. I am just amazed at reading this, because since the days I was learning history as a student I have never heard of this. It is not in the textbooks."
No French record of the proposal appears to exist, and it is unclear whether there were any proposals for the name of the new union. A spokesman for the French embassy said most people had been surprised by the revelation. "We are looking at our national archives," he said. "We cannot comment at this stage."
8 comments:
Well, I think it would have been preferable to what we have now. Instead of sharing our Government solely with France, we now share it with Belgium, Greece, Bulgaria and Romania (along with 22 other former nations of Europe).
Fascinating. There's certainly a long history there, going back to the Hundred Year's War. It would have been interesting to see the bi-national political structure that would have come with such a move, and would have been hugely supported by French Canadians, I would think, who have always dreamed of their own Anglo-Franco bi-national state.
At least we would have got Calais back (still one of the most English pieces of another country I have ever come across).
What's fascinating too is the story of that postage stamp- comissioned in 1940 before the fall of France when Churchill first muted the idea.
It wasn't really a discussion, France asked and we said 'Non'.
http://england-is-cool.blogspot.com/
what happened to the pic?
Not only was it not a discussion, but the Prime Minister appears to be a total whack-job, making an absurd demand completely unilaterally from the president, and the rest of the French government.
There would be too many good Frenchmen - whether Reds, Gaullists or sons of the Vendee and the King - who would have taken up arms against Paris for such an idea.
Good for England that they said "No".
Post a Comment