A Lion not a Mouse
Four more soldiers fighting with the Royal Canadian Regiment and the Royal Canadian Dragoons were killed in Afghanistan on Friday, and eight others were seriously injured. Canada has now lost 116 soldiers and one diplomat in that war-torn country, including several hundred non-fatal combat casualties.
This sacrifice is proportionately greater than either the Americans or the British, and in real numbers significantly more so than all of Europe combined. But like anything Canada ever does, it gets greeted by the media and the world with a collective international yawn. Or worse, the subject of trash entertainment by Republican chickenhawkes on Fox News, who shamelessly chide Canada's military men as frigid wimps, whilst demonstrating their own macho credentials without ever serving a day in their life. To hell with neocon sissies.
I know a lot of men who are serving in theatre because I trained with them over 20 years ago. They are now in positions of command, like LCol. Misener above who has been rotating in and out of Afghanistan since 2002. Does he look like a wimp to you? He's as professional as they come, not a warmongering television idiot, but a field commander on the front lines who has to carefully measure his every word with manly restraint, unlike the belligerent fools on Fox who laugh at him.
It is fashionable among many so-called conservatives in the United States to think of Canada as a joke of a country. It's a view that began to take shape ever since Pierre Trudeau famously declared Canada a mouse next to the American elephant, affected by every twitch, every grunt. In one fell swoop, the historical image of Canada as a British Lion was gone forever. Liberals perferred to think of Canada as a mouse not a lion. And so a mouse in the image of many we became.
But Canada doesn't need to demonstrate its fortitude to the world, only its soberness. Canada cannot afford to be a gung ho, kick ass nation, nor should it desire such a reputation. It almost came apart at the seams during both world wars, when conscription riots in French Canada threatened the political survival of the country. Yet it still sent hundreds of thousands of men overseas to save Europe from itself. Over 100,000 Canadians perished as a result. The decision by Canada to stay out of Vietnam and Iraq has probably been more or less right. It's decision to tough it out in Afghanistan has also probably been more or less right. The desire to go to war for macho reasons is a profoundly unconservative attitude, and nearly all Canadians rightly perish the thought.
Update from American Vets: Ouch
7 comments:
I think Canada and Canadians will have to just tough it out. Sad to see that perceptions can be so wrong but I for one know that they are there in the thick of it fighting the sub-human filth that is the Taliban. For every Canadian soldier who gives his life I hope he takes ten Taliban scum with him!
This crank has a program at 3 am, which says a lot about his stature and influence. He thought taking pot shots at Canada would earn a chuckle from a class of ignorant bafoons who couldn't find Canada on a map. PT Barnum is suppose to have observed that no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public. This incidence sadly proves the point.
The vast majority of U.S. citizens and Fox News viewers have nothing but the utmost respect and admiration for our Canadian brothers in arms who are standing with us in this fight against the forces of evil. My son is in the 1st Inf Div and my best friend are in SW Afghanistan and have participated in numerous combined ops with Canadian Forces and say they are the most professional soldiers he has ever seen. He has learned lots of tactics from them and says the artillery battery at his FOB has the fastest and most accurate fire-missions and counter-battery fires he has ever seen. His only problem with the canadian GI's is there aren't enough of them. Says he does prefer his AIMPOINT optic to the ELCAN though.
It is tempting to dismiss this as just the work of a few ignorant cranks, but if defending the honour of the brave and the fallen embarrasses these guys into an apology, then I think it's worth doing. I don't need these guy's sensitivity to protect my feelings, but we could use a little recognition that our guys in the field are not a bunch of panzies.
By the way, I share the crticism that we don't have nearly enough of them. I think we could use three times the army that we have now, if only the government could get the message.
Glad to hear you attended the Royal Military College, Sir Beaverbrook. I too intend to attend that most noble institute of education once I've finished my upgrading on some less than satisfactory marks from high school.
On the topic of the FOX news team that, as the youngsters would say, 'dissed' Canada's army and the sacrifice of our boys in Afghanistan, they are nothing more but strutting wannabe-macho men. Fools and cads, the lot of them. If they ever met Private Bloggins, and tried to pick a fight with him, I'd doubt they do very well. Maybe that would teach them some manners about a nation's military.
Cheers,
-Gladstone
PS: Private Bloggins is the equivalent to Tommy Atkins, but for the Canadian Army.
The program may well have intended to have been satirical, but that does not stop it from being insulting to the point of being demeaning.
The only thing Fox News and their parent company News Corporation considers is revenue (i.e. viewers). So may I suggest that you let Mr Gutfeld's betters think of his program. You can e-mail Mr Brian Lewis, Fox's Executive VP for communication at brian.lewis@foxnews.com
Mac
Quo Fas et Gloria Ducunt
My local paper printed a Times article today entitled "How Hollywood Won the War". It highlights how US studios take stories of enduring courage and ingenuity and twist the history to suit American patriotic tastes.
Citing the examples of 'The Great Escape, 'Saving Private Ryan' and 'U-571' it makes a nice wee quip of about the American take of WW2 being based on "an event that never took place, involving an American who was not there, and a machine which had not yet been invented".
Is it any wonder that there is a section of the American population that labours under delutions, such as the presenters on Fox News?
Post a Comment